Most OKR software helps teams set goals.
Far fewer help teams track the KPIs that actually show whether those goals are working.
As companies grow, the failure mode shifts. OKRs don’t break because objectives are unclear. They break because the KPI signal is weak, delayed, or disconnected from execution. Metrics go green while outcomes stay flat. Dashboards look healthy, but leaders stop trusting what they’re seeing.
This guide evaluates OKR software through a narrow lens: how well it tracks KPIs tied to OKRs. That means real-time visibility, dashboards leaders actually use, early-warning signals when things drift, and metrics that reflect reality - not status updates.
If KPI tracking is weak, OKRs become reporting. If it’s strong, OKRs become a control system.
Why KPI Tracking Is the Real Test of OKR Software
You can write good OKRs in a document. You cannot run OKRs there.
The moment a company relies on OKRs to steer execution, KPI tracking becomes the make-or-break capability.
In practice, many teams blur the line between Key Results and KPIs. Metrics that should monitor business health often get written as Key Results, even though they aren’t designed to drive change. When this happens, OKRs slowly lose their power.
When Key Results become passive metrics, teams start tracking numbers instead of driving outcomes - and leadership loses clear signal on what’s actually moving the business.
The good news is you don’t need to overhaul your process to fix it. You just need to know what to look for - and how to guide teams away from KPI thinking and back toward true outcome-based Key Results. X
Without it:
- Key Results drift from outcomes into activity
- Progress becomes subjective and narrative-driven
- Risk surfaces too late to correct
- Leadership loses confidence in the system
Strong KPI tracking inside OKRs does three things:
- Creates honest signal mid-quarter, not just at review time
- Forces tradeoffs, because outcomes are visible
- Enables intervention, instead of post-mortems
Most OKR tools claim to support KPIs. Very few do it in a way that leaders trust when decisions actually matter.
9 Best OKR Software for KPI Tracking
Not all OKR tools treat KPIs as first-class citizens. Some bury them in dashboards, others force them into Key Results where they don’t belong.
The best OKR software makes it easy to separate outcomes from health metrics - while keeping both visible, trusted, and connected.
1. OKRs Tool
Best for real-time KPI tracking tied directly to execution in growing teams
I built OKRs Tool after watching scaleups “track” OKRs that had no relationship to real business metrics. KPIs lived in spreadsheets or BI tools, OKRs lived somewhere else, and progress updates became storytelling exercises. The signal broke long before execution did.
OKRs Tool is designed to keep KPIs close to the work for growth-stage, technology-driven teams in SaaS, fintech, logistics, manufacturing, and B2B services.
KPI tracking is intentionally focused on core workflows: organization-level KPIs with clear ownership, simple updates, visible targets, and direct links to OKRs. Leadership can see what’s moving and what’s not - mid-quarter, not after the fact.
What stands out is restraint. It doesn’t try to be a data warehouse or HR suite. It focuses on decision-quality KPI signal that helps teams intervene early.
What you’ll like
- KPIs tied directly to Key Results, not status notes
- Single-owner KPIs with clear targets and on-track / at-risk / off-track status
- Real-time roll-ups and a sortable KPI table for fast visibility
What you might not like
- Not a BI tool for complex data modeling
- Relies on integrations for advanced analytics
Pricing: Flat team pricing. No per-user fees. Free for 1-5 users.
2. Profit.co
Best for KPI-heavy organizations with formal performance systems
Profit.co approaches KPI tracking as part of a broader execution and performance framework. KPIs are treated as structured assets, not lightweight indicators. They connect OKRs, initiatives, and employee performance into a single system.
For organizations where KPI definitions, ownership, and historical trends matter deeply, Profit.co offers serious depth. Leaders can compare KPI performance across teams and quarters, and track how metrics evolve over time.
The tradeoff is complexity. This is not a casual tool. It assumes process maturity and rewards teams willing to invest in structure.
What you’ll like
- Dedicated KPI scorecards linked to OKRs
- Historical KPI trend analysis across cycles
- Strong governance and ownership controls
What you might not like
- Heavy setup for smaller teams
- Can feel overwhelming if you just need visibility
Pricing: Not disclosed on their website
3. Weekdone
Best for weekly KPI visibility and early warning
Weekdone’s strength is rhythm. It’s built around the idea that KPIs should surface problems before reviews, not during them. Progress is checked weekly, trends are highlighted automatically, and leaders get a steady pulse on execution.
KPI tracking here isn’t about sophistication - it’s about timing. Teams see when metrics start to slide and can act while there’s still room to recover.
If your biggest risk is discovering KPI issues too late, Weekdone is effective at preventing that.
What you’ll like
- Weekly KPI check-ins baked into the workflow
- Automatic trend indicators
- Simple dashboards leaders actually review
What you might not like
- Limited automation from data sources
- Less depth for complex KPI analysis
Pricing: Starts at $10/user/month.
4. Tability
Best for simple, outcome-focused KPI tracking
Tability keeps KPI tracking intentionally lightweight. It focuses on whether outcomes are moving, not on building complex reporting layers. KPIs are visually tied to Key Results, making it easy to see progress at a glance.
This simplicity works well for teams that want honest signal without overhead. Updates are fast, adoption is easy, and OKRs stay visible without turning into a reporting burden.
The limitation is scale. As KPI needs become more complex, teams may outgrow it.
What you’ll like
- Clean, modern KPI dashboards
- Fast updates tied directly to OKRs
- Minimal setup and low friction
What you might not like
- Limited analytics and integrations
- Not built for large or complex orgs
Pricing: Free plan available; paid plans from $6/user/month.
5. Quantive
Best for automated KPI tracking from live data sources
Quantive is designed for companies that want KPIs flowing directly from systems like CRMs, analytics tools, and databases. Instead of manual updates, metrics refresh automatically as the business changes.
This makes OKRs feel less like a ritual and more like a live performance system. Leaders can trust that KPI movement reflects reality, not reporting lag. Quantive works best in organizations with mature data pipelines and reliable source systems already in place.
What you’ll like
- Automated KPI updates via integrations
- Advanced analytics and reporting
- Strong support for large-scale tracking
What you might not like
- Heavier setup and configuration
- Overkill without solid data foundations
Pricing: Custom pricing.
6. Perdoo
Best for connecting KPIs to strategy and long-term outcomes
Perdoo emphasizes the relationship between strategy, OKRs, and KPIs. Instead of focusing only on quarterly execution, it helps leadership visualize how metrics support broader strategic goals.
KPIs live alongside strategy maps and OKRs, making it easier to see whether execution supports long-term direction. This is particularly valuable for leadership alignment and board-level conversations.
It’s less about speed and more about coherence.
What you’ll like
- Strong OKR–KPI linkage
- Strategy maps for leadership visibility
- Clear alignment from vision to metrics
What you might not like
- More complex than teams need early on
- UI can feel dated
Pricing: Starts around $7/user/month.
7. Mooncamp
Best for flexible KPI tracking in autonomous teams
Mooncamp offers flexibility rather than prescription. Teams can define how KPIs relate to OKRs without being forced into rigid structures. The interface is modern, and dashboards are visually appealing.
This works well in cultures that value autonomy and experimentation. Teams can adapt KPI tracking to how they operate rather than conforming to a fixed system.
The downside is consistency. Without discipline, KPI definitions can drift across teams.
What you’ll like
- Customizable KPI structures
- Beautiful, modern interface
- Flexible workflows
What you might not like
- Fewer guardrails for consistency
- Limited deep integrations
Pricing: Starts at $7/user/month.
8. Leapsome
Best for KPI tracking tied to performance and development
Leapsome integrates OKRs and KPIs into performance management, feedback, and reviews. KPIs are visible in context - not just as numbers, but as inputs to performance conversations.
This makes it useful for organizations where OKRs are owned by people ops or leadership development, not just product or ops. It is not built for real-time operational KPI monitoring.
What you’ll like
- KPIs visible in reviews and feedback cycles
- Strong people-performance linkage
- Clean UX
What you might not like
- Limited real-time KPI dashboards
- Less execution-focused than dedicated OKR tools.
Pricing: Custom pricing.
9. WorkBoard
Best for executive-level KPI oversight at scale
WorkBoard is built for organizations where KPI tracking is a leadership discipline. It emphasizes accountability, governance, and executive visibility across many teams.
KPIs roll up into exec dashboards and QBR views, making it easier for leadership to see where execution is breaking down across the organization.
This power comes with overhead. WorkBoard assumes OKRs are already embedded in how the company operates.
What you’ll like
- Strong executive KPI dashboards
- Cross-functional roll-ups
- Clear ownership and accountability
What you might not like
- Heavy setup and process
- Not startup-friendly
Pricing: Custom pricing.
How These OKR Platforms Handle KPI Tracking
This comparison shows what really happens to KPIs inside each tool - where they live, who owns them, how they’re updated, and whether leaders can actually use them during the quarter.
See the differences below.
If you need KPIs to change decisions during the quarter, prioritize tools with live visibility and clear ownership. If KPIs are primarily for reviews, governance, or performance discussions, periodic visibility may be sufficient.
KPI Tracking Is Where OKRs Become Real
OKRs fail when dashboards stay green, reviews stay calm, and the business drifts anyway.
The difference between teams that feel aligned and teams that actually execute is KPI signal quality. When KPIs are live, visible, and trusted, OKRs become a steering mechanism. When they’re late, manual, or cosmetic, OKRs become performance theater.
Choosing OKR software for KPI tracking is not about finding the most sophisticated platform. It’s about choosing the system that makes reality hardest to ignore. The one that surfaces bad news early, assigns ownership clearly, and forces tradeoffs before the quarter is already lost.
If your OKRs aren’t changing decisions mid-quarter, the problem isn’t your ambition - it’s your signal.
